Effect of Alcoholic Extract
of Stem Bark of Anamirta cocculus Willd on Central Nervous System
U. S. Jijith1,2,*, C. R. Sudhakaran Nair1, K. Pramod1,2
1College of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Govt. Medical
College, Thiruvananthapuram – 695011, Kerala, India.
2College of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Govt. Medical
College, Kozhikode – 673008, Kerala, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: jijithus@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Anamirta cocculus
Willd is a well known medicinal plant belonging to
the family Menispermaceae. Its ethanolic extract was evaluated for locomotor activity, analgesic activity and muscle relaxant
activity. The rotarod apparatus was used for
evaluation of muscle relaxant activity. The extract showed significant decrease
in fall off time which indicated that it has CNS depressant activity when
compared with diazepam. Photoactometer was used to
study of locomotor activity in mice. The effects were
found to be dose dependent statistically significant when compared with control
groups. Hot plate was used to study of analgesic activity of extract. The
reaction time was increased in the extract treated groups than that of morphine
as standard drug. The antipyretic activity of extract was investigated
experimental rats. The antipyretic was retained in all the dose of extract
tested was comparable to that of paracetamol as
standard drug.
KEYWORDS: Muscle relaxant activity; locomotor
activity; analgesic activity; antipyretic activity.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Anamirta cocculus,
belonging to family Menispermaceae, is an Southest Asian and Indian climbing plant.[1] Anamirta cocculus
holds a reputed position as medicinal herb. Its leaves and fruits are used in
medicine the fruit is slightly bitter , good expectorant , removes gases from
intestine, good for rheumatism and as applications for inflammation Various
alkaloids are isolated from the plants. This is popular folk remedy in Asia and
adjacent regions in the Philippiens, and infusion of
roots of Anamita cocculus is
used to treat fever, dyspepsia and menstrual
problem. Extract of the stem is added to native wine and is drunk to
make blood strong.
One of the important pharmacological action of minor
tranquillizers or anti anxiety agents is the skeletal muscle relaxation
together with taming or calming effect and reduction in anxiety and tension.
The site of this activity is the CNS. Disturbance in the maintenance of tone
and posture is the first sign of centrally mediated skeletal muscle relaxation.
A drug increasing or decreasing CNS activity will also produce increase or
decrease in spontaneous motor activity (SMA) in the animal. Locomotor
activity refers to an increase in alertness and decrease in locomotor
activity considered as sedative. The locomotor
activity can be an index of wakefulness (alertness) of mental activity. Pyrexia
is a condition, where the body temperature is elevated than normal value.
Antipyretics reduce the elevated body temperature which occurs in pyrexia.
Pharmacological studies of effect of plants and their
extracts on central nervous system could be beneficial in identification of new
lead molecules. Thus the aim of the present study was to evaluate ethanolic extract of stem bark of Anamita cocculus for CNS activities. Studies on
muscle relaxant, locomotor, analgesic and antipyretic
activities could be studied for screening CNS activity.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
2.1. Materials
An alcoholic extract prepared from the stem bark of Anamirta cocculus
prepared as reported previously was used for the study.[2] Since the
extract was partially soluble in distilled water a suspension was prepared with
0.1% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and this
suspension was used.
2.2. Ethical
clearance, animal maintenance and care
Experiments on animals were carried out after getting
approval from Institutional Animal Ethics Committee, Govt. Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram (No. 39/IAEC/MCT/06; dated 19.09.2006).
Albino rats and
mice were collected from the animal house, Govt. Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India. The mice were maintained on
pellet diet and water ad libitum. Animals were housed in propylene cages with
dust free rice husk as bedding material under laboratory conditions with
control environment of temperature 30±2oC. They were fed ad libitum with rodents chow and free access to
drinking water.
2.3. Muscle relaxant activity
Rotarod apparatus was used to study muscle relaxant activity.
Healthy albino mice of both sexes weighing between 20 and 25 g, fed on water
alone for 18 hours were used. The mice were trained to walk on a rotating rod,
rotated at 25 rpm and selected only those animals which stayed for a
period of 2-5 minutes in the successive
trials. After selection, they were
divided in to 5 groups of 6 each. Each
animal was placed on the rotating rod, and noted down the ‘fall off time’ when
the mouse falls from the rotating rod. The extract as a suspension in 0.1% CMC
was given orally at a dose of 400 and 800mg/kg body weight of animal. The third
group served as the control and was given vehicle (10 mL/kg
body weight). Diazepam (4 mg/kg) was given orally to the standard group of
animals. Forty minutes later, each
animal was re-tested for the ‘fall off time’ and difference was noted.[3-7]
2.4. Effect on locomotor
activity
Photoactometer was used to study locomotor
activity. Healthy albino mice of both sexes weighing between 20 and 25 g were
used for the study. They were fed on water alone for 18 hours. Animals were
individually placed in activity cage for 10 minutes and checked basal activity
score of all the animals. Selected animals were divided into 4 groups each
containing six animals. The first group served as the control and was given the
vehicle (10 mL/kg body weight). Diazepam in a dose of
4 mg/kg body weight was given orally to the second group. The extract as
suspension in 0.1% CMC was given orally in a dose of 400 mg/kg to third group
and 800mg/kg body weight to group IV. After 60 minutes, re-checked
each mouse for activity scores for 10 minutes and change in the activity was
noted. The change in activity of the test group was compared with that of the
standard and control.[8-11]
2.5. Analgesic activity
Analgesic activity was studied by hot plate method
where heat is used as source of pain. Albino mice of both sexes, weighing
between 20 and 25 g, starved overnight, being allowed free access of water,
were used. Weight of the entire animal was taken and each one was marked for
identification. They were divided in to 4 groups of 6 mice each. The initial
reaction time of all the animals of control and test groups were recorded by
putting them on the Hot plate maintained at 55oC. Licking of paw or jumping was taken as the
index of reaction to heat. A cut off
time of 15 s was used to prevent injury to the paws. To the control group,
vehicle (0.1% CMC) of the extract solution in a dose of 10 ml/kg body weight
was given. The standard drug morphine sulphate, 5
mg/kg was given to the second group. The other three groups received extract
solution in a dose of 400 and 800mg/kg body weight respectively. All the above
drugs are administered orally. The reaction time of each of animal at 30, 60
and 120 min after administration were
noted.[12-15]
2.6. Antipyretic activity
Study to evaluate antipyretic activity was
carried out as per previously reported method. [16-20] Albino rats
weighing 150-200 g were fed till 24 h prior administering drugs. The room
temperature was kept at 30-32oC.
Animals were divided in to four groups of 6 animals each. Each of them
was marked for proper identification using marking ink. Then food was withdrawn
prior to measurement of rectal temperature. One and half centimetres
of a digital thermometer was introduced in rectum of the rats and the rectal
temperature was recorded. Pyrexia was induced by subcutaneous injection in the
back below the nape of the neck of a 20% suspension of dried yeast in 0.1% CMC
at a dose of 20 mL/kg of body weight. The site of
injection was massaged in order to spread the suspension beneath the skin.
After 18 h of yeast injection, rats which showed a rise in temperature of at
least 1o F (0.6°C) were taken for the study. Animals in
the various groups were treated as follows:
Group I : 0.1% CMC (10 ml/kg) as vehicle, orally.
Group II : Aqueous suspension of alcoholic
extract of Anamirta cocculus
400 mg/kg in 0.1% CMC suspension, orally.
Group III: Aqueous
suspension of alcoholic extract of Anamirta
cocculus 800 mg/kg in 0.1% CMC suspension,
orally.
Group IV:
Paracetamol, 100 mg/kg in 0.1% CMC suspension, orally.
Rectal temperature was recorded every hour
for 2 hours after administration of drugs.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
3.1. Muscle relaxant activity
In the rota-rod test, the
extract in doses of 400 and 800 mg/kg body weight, produced a decrease in ‘fall
off time’ of 52.3% and 78.2% respectively and diazepam (4 mg/kg) showed 88.4%
decrease in ‘fall off time’. The two doses of the extract at 60 minutes after
administration of the extract showed significant effects (p<0.05) when
compared with control group. Results are shown in Figure 1.
Fig 1: Muscle relaxant activity of Anamirta cocculus
extract
3.2. Effect on locomotor
activity
Diazepam (4 mg/kg) reduced the locomotor
activity by 83.6% when compared to the initial value. The group treated with
extract of 400 mg/kg showed a reduction of activity to the extent of 72.42%
from initial value and the group received extract at a dose of 800mg/kg showed
a reduction of activity by 87.83% from the initial value. These effects were
found to be dose dependent and statistically significant (p<0.05) when
compared to the control groups. Results are shown in Figure 2. The reduction in
locomotor activity may be due to the CNS depressant
effect. It may be due to its tranquilizing, centrally acting muscle relaxant or
analgesic effect.
Fig 2: Locomotor activity of Anamirta cocculus
extract
3.3. Analgesic activity
The group treated with morphine sulphate
5 mg/kg body weight showed marked increase in reaction time and peak effect was
attained at 30 minute, after drug administration the analgesic effects
sustained 1 h. The extract treated groups also showed increase in the reaction
time and it was higher than that of standard. The effect of the two dose of
extract at 30, 60 min after injection were found to be statistically
significant (p<0.05) when compared with control group. Results are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1: Analgesic activity of Anamirta cocculus
extract
Treatments |
Reaction time in seconds (Mean ± SEM) |
|||
0 min |
30 min |
60 min |
120 min |
|
Control (Vehicle
1%CMC) |
4.0±0.44 |
3.5±0.42 |
3.3±0.49 |
3.3±0.42 |
Morphine sulphate 5 mg/kg |
3.83±0.30 |
7.8±0.44 |
5.0±0.44 |
3.7±0.42 |
Extract 400 mg/kg |
4.2±0.47 |
7.7±0.66 |
5.6±0.89 |
5.3±0.75 |
Extract 800 mg/kg |
3.83±0.30 |
11.5±0.76 |
7.16±0.40 |
3.3±0.33 |
3.4. Antipyretic activity
The administration of yeast suspension caused an
elevation in body temperature up to 1-1.6 oC
in rats. The groups treated with extract 400 and 800 mg/kg showed inhibition of
pyrexia by a respectively when compared with the rise of body temperature among
the same group. The group treated with paracetamol
showed a reduction of pyrexia by 27.7%.
The results are statistically significant for p =0.000. Results are
shown in Figure 3. The antipyretic effect of the test drug may be due to the
presence of flavonoid compounds which could cause
predominant inhibition of cyclooxygenase or lipooxygenase.
Fig 3: Antipyretic activity of Anamirta cocculus extract
4. CONCLUSION:
Based on the results of the present study
we could conclude that the extract of Anamirta cocculus possess significant antidepressant like
effect, muscle relaxant activity, analgesic activity and antipyretic effects.
However, further studies are required to find out the exact mechanism behind
these activities. Pharmacological studies of effect of plants and their extracts
on central nervous system could be beneficial in identification of new lead
molecules.
5.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
None
6.
REFERENCES:
1. Lyle EC, James ES. Editors. Herbs, Spices
and Medicinal Plants, Recent Advances in Botany, Horticulture and Pharmacology,
CBS publishers. Vol-4:192.
2. Jijith US, Nair CRS, Pramod
K. Preliminary phytochemical screening of alcoholic
extract of stem bark of Anamirta cocculus Willd. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2016, 8(1).
3. Sheth UK, Dadkar NK;
Selected Topics in Experimental Pharmacology , 1st Ed,
1972; 129-130.
4. Kulkarni SK. Hand book of Experimental Pharmacology,
3rd Ed. Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan; 2002
p.122-123.
5. Turner RA. Screening Methods in
Pharmacology, London: Academic Press; 1965. p.89.
6. Ramesh KG. Practicals in
Pharmacology. 2nd Ed. Ahmedbad: B.S Shah Prakashan;
1999. P-99-100.
7. Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. 4th
Ed, New Delhi; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P)
Ltd.2002 .p.157-159.
8. Kulkarni SK. Hand book of Experimental Pharmacology,
Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan.
3rd Ed. 2002 p.117-118.
9. Turner RA. Screening Methods in
pharmacology, London: Academic Press. 1965. P.79.
10. Sheth U.K. Dadkar .NK,
1972 Selected Topics in Experimental Pharmacology, 1st Ed. p.130
11. Ramesh KG. Practicals in
Pharmacology, 2nd Ed, Ahmedbad: B.S. Shah
Prakashan.1999-2000. p-99-100.
12. Ghosh MN; Fundamentals of Experimental
Pharmacology, 3rd Ed, Kolkata: Hilton and Company. p. 175-176.
13. Sheth UK, Dadkar NK Selected
Topics in Experimental Pharmacology, 1st Ed, 1972, 135-136.
14. Laurence DR.Evalution
of Drug Activities: Pharmacometrics, vol-1 London and
New York: Academic Press. 1964. P 183-201.
15. Vogel HG,Vogel WH.
Drug Discovery and Evaluation. New York:
Springer verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1997. p. 370.
16. Hukkeri. Antipyretic and wound healing activities
of Moringa oleifera lam.in rats,Indian j Pharma Sci, 2006; 68:124-126.
17. Ray D. Antipyretic, antidiarrhoeal,
hypglycaemic and heptoprotective
activities of ethyl acetate extract of Acacia cateachu
Willd in albino rats. Indian j Pharmacol,
2006 (38) p.408-413.
18. Vogel HG, Vogel WH. Drug Discovery and
Evaluation. New York: Springervelag Berlin
Heidelberg; 1997. p.418.
19. Ramesh KG. Practicals in
Pharmacology, 2nd Ed, Ahmedbad: B.S. Shah Prakashan. 1999-2000. p.57-59.
20. Sheth UK, Dadkar NK,
1972 Selected Topics in Experimetnal Pharmacology,
1st Ed. p.189-190.
Received on 15.06.2016 Modified on 28.06.2016
Accepted on 20.07.2016
©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem.
2016; 8(3): 141-144.
DOI: 10.5958/0975-4385.2016.00025.X